Since my wife died, I've been doing a lot of travel. Most recently was a western Mediterranean cruise that included some places new to me.
On a showery day in Palma de Mallorca I slipped on a broad, slick crosswalk stripe, instantly fell on my back and broke a rib on a large, rounded paving stone.
This is about my adventures getting home from Barcelona, where the cruise ended.
My return flight booking was on an Air France subsidiary called Joon -- pronounced and intended as a cute version of jeune (young). That would get me to Paris where I'd catch a regular Air France to Seattle.
Alas! I learned at the airport that the Joon fight had been canceled. Fortunately, they were able to book me on British Airways to London and then Seattle, arriving not long after I otherwise would have. That worked out well.
When I entered my apartment house the elevator had a sign saying that it was broken. My man-cave is on the 4th floor. So here I was, 22 hours after I had woken up, with a broken rib and a suitcase weighing close to 40 pounds. The stairway is a zig-zag affair, doing one floor in two segments with a flat turnaround between each zig and zag -- six sets of stairs in all to the 4th floor. The step rise is a little less than the standard 8 inches, which was helpful. Pulling the suitcase after me was out of the question because that would have meant twisting my body under the strain of its weight: very painful. So using a knee, I'd heft/kick it to the 3rd step, then heft 2 steps at a time to get to the next flat spot. A slow process: tiring and with some pain.
Once I got to my apartment I had to decide where I would sleep. The first two nights following my fall I slept in the ship cabin bed. But getting out of bed was extremely painful because I had to twist my body. On a scale of 0-10 where 10 is unbearable, I was at about level 8 or a touch higher, involuntarily crying out with each movement. The final cruise night I slept in a chair, where rising didn't involve twisting.
I continue to sleep either sitting up or reclining. The first couple nights here I used the couch, but now I use a chair that reclines, allowing me to be more horizontal.
Whether the rib is starting to heal or through better use of pain killers, I'm doing better on that front. I alternate Ibuprofen and Tylenol every three hours (based on the doc's hint) and that keeps a fairly steady stream of pain relief in me. The rib area is not pain-free, but the sensations are manageable.
Now I need to lose some of the weight I gained while on the cruise.
Occasional thoughts by the late, lamented 2Blowhards blog's third Blowhard. Head blowhard was Ray Sawhill (aka "Michael Blowhard"), his co-blogger was "Friedrich von Blowhard." I was invited in when Friedrich needed to devote his energy to his business, and had a fun five-year run.
Wednesday, November 28, 2018
Self-Driving Cars: Future or Fad
I'm old enough to have lived through a number of fads that had promised to be waves of the future, an inevitable future where the fad-subject would be in total domination.
Of course, sometimes this proves to be the case. More often, the item does continue into the future but in modified and not dominant form.
So it might well be regarding the current flurry for self-driving cars.
My bias is that I would almost never want to own one. Further, I find it hard to believe that any kind of sensor-based systems can substitute for human perception coupled with experience. Possibly in a hundred years, if "artificial intelligence" proves to be as good as its proponents claim. But that too is an intellectual fad, though a long lasting one that might come to pass.
In, say, ten years the government (alias Big Brother) mandates that all new cars be self-driving, I hope the lawmakers and regulators are wise enough to allow the self-driving mode to be switched on or off at the driver's discretion. Self-driving on sensor-rich highways and arterials and human-driving on country roads or off-road trails.
Of course, sometimes this proves to be the case. More often, the item does continue into the future but in modified and not dominant form.
So it might well be regarding the current flurry for self-driving cars.
My bias is that I would almost never want to own one. Further, I find it hard to believe that any kind of sensor-based systems can substitute for human perception coupled with experience. Possibly in a hundred years, if "artificial intelligence" proves to be as good as its proponents claim. But that too is an intellectual fad, though a long lasting one that might come to pass.
In, say, ten years the government (alias Big Brother) mandates that all new cars be self-driving, I hope the lawmakers and regulators are wise enough to allow the self-driving mode to be switched on or off at the driver's discretion. Self-driving on sensor-rich highways and arterials and human-driving on country roads or off-road trails.
Wednesday, November 21, 2018
Bright Car Colors
Back in the early 1970s the fashion for automobile paint schemes was for really bright, bold colors.
For example, here is my 1971 Porsche 914:
It was a pretty small car -- a lot smaller than current Porsches, for instance. But the bright colors worked just about as well as more conservative hues. Moreover, this was true of most smaller cars: the smaller the car, the easier it was to wear bright colors. On the other hand, most large cars seemed odd if they were painted that way.
In my opinion, the only large cars that could handle bright colors were convertibles such as this 1950 Cadillac, one of the largest automobiles of its day. Perhaps the lack of a metal top that would add even more sheet metal requiring paint made the difference. Or maybe it simply had to do with convertibles being sporty cars where bright colors were a factor in that sportiness. Either way, perception psychology seems to matter.
And so it follows that large, formal cars seem to look better painted in dark hues such as on this 1953 Cadillac 60 Special.
For example, here is my 1971 Porsche 914:
It was a pretty small car -- a lot smaller than current Porsches, for instance. But the bright colors worked just about as well as more conservative hues. Moreover, this was true of most smaller cars: the smaller the car, the easier it was to wear bright colors. On the other hand, most large cars seemed odd if they were painted that way.
In my opinion, the only large cars that could handle bright colors were convertibles such as this 1950 Cadillac, one of the largest automobiles of its day. Perhaps the lack of a metal top that would add even more sheet metal requiring paint made the difference. Or maybe it simply had to do with convertibles being sporty cars where bright colors were a factor in that sportiness. Either way, perception psychology seems to matter.
And so it follows that large, formal cars seem to look better painted in dark hues such as on this 1953 Cadillac 60 Special.
Wednesday, November 14, 2018
Pre-1946 Military History is Best
I confess to being a military history buff. Have been reading it almost since I became aware that there was such things as history books. Well, perhaps a bit later than that, but certainly by the time I was in junior high school.
I also kept up with developments in military equipment, aircraft in particular.
The problem was, much about recent (at the time) military history as well as the current equipment was classified. What information that was available -- especially for things such as capabilities of currently active aircraft -- could sometimes border on Public Relations press releases. (My Army job happened to be Public Relations, by the way.)
After a period of time, information became declassified. Probably the most famous case was Ultra, the British decoding of coded and enciphered German radio messages. Histories of World War 2 written before 1974 did not include this important information: we had to wait nearly 30 years after the war ended to learn of it.
So now I tend to ignore accounts of military events that occurred, say, less than 70 years ago. As for aircraft, information about types currently in service might not be entirely trustworthy, especially regarding any defects or limitations.
Recently I've been reading a lot about naval vessels from World War 2 and earlier, and figure I'm gettin a fairly truthful picture.
I also kept up with developments in military equipment, aircraft in particular.
The problem was, much about recent (at the time) military history as well as the current equipment was classified. What information that was available -- especially for things such as capabilities of currently active aircraft -- could sometimes border on Public Relations press releases. (My Army job happened to be Public Relations, by the way.)
After a period of time, information became declassified. Probably the most famous case was Ultra, the British decoding of coded and enciphered German radio messages. Histories of World War 2 written before 1974 did not include this important information: we had to wait nearly 30 years after the war ended to learn of it.
So now I tend to ignore accounts of military events that occurred, say, less than 70 years ago. As for aircraft, information about types currently in service might not be entirely trustworthy, especially regarding any defects or limitations.
Recently I've been reading a lot about naval vessels from World War 2 and earlier, and figure I'm gettin a fairly truthful picture.
Tuesday, November 6, 2018
Father Nosser
I don't know what the U.S. Army does these days, but when I was attached to Fort Meade, Maryland's post headquarters we had to take maybe one morning a month for Training. Part of that was something called "character guidance" which meant that a chaplain would speak to us.
The one chaplain I still remember was Father Nosser, a Catholic. Being an army captain and unmarried he could afford a sporty Oldsmobile -- none of that vow of poverty for chaplains, though I suppose he did turn over part of his income to the Church.
When he gave us character guidance he first lit up a cigarette. Then he would casually lean on the podium and say a bunch of casual things with a message buried someplace. When his cigarette burned down to a nub, he'd snuff it and end his talk -- the cigarette being his timer.
I always enjoyed Father Nosser because he was brief and fun to hear.
The one chaplain I still remember was Father Nosser, a Catholic. Being an army captain and unmarried he could afford a sporty Oldsmobile -- none of that vow of poverty for chaplains, though I suppose he did turn over part of his income to the Church.
When he gave us character guidance he first lit up a cigarette. Then he would casually lean on the podium and say a bunch of casual things with a message buried someplace. When his cigarette burned down to a nub, he'd snuff it and end his talk -- the cigarette being his timer.
I always enjoyed Father Nosser because he was brief and fun to hear.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)