World Wars 1 and 2 had many causes, some more salient than others.
One kind of cause had to do with a country opting for war because to delay would make fighting enemies in the future more risky. This was a factor for Germany in 1914 and for Japan in 1941.
In Germany's case, a major potential enemy was the Russian Empire. Russia was beaten by Japan in their 1904-05 war, but its military was recovering by 1914 and the country was rapidly industrializing. German army staff planners feared that the Russians, who outnumbered Germans, would probably be considerably more formidable in just a few years. This consideration helped push an already aggressive German Empire into war.
Japan's case is more complicated to explain. In brief, the Japanese Empire had been at war with China for a few years. The year before that conflict began, Japan renounced warship limitation treaties and began increasing the size of its navy. America began building battleships again around that time, and orders for ships increased as the war in Europe wore on.
Senior Imperial Japanese Navy officers were well aware that the USA could massively out-build Japan in all weapons categories, so renouncing limitation treaties was probably unwise while emotionally satisfying. As 1941 wore on, the US imposed resource restrictions on Japan, oil and steel in particular, in an effort to persuade Japan to end its war with China. Expansion-minded Japanese officers who dominated government policy at that time then had the choices of (1) acceding to American wishes, (2) waiting matters out while their petroleum reserves gradually depleted and America launched far more warships than Japan could, or (3) starting war soon while resources were at hand and America's ships were yet to be commissioned. The third option was selected in the hope that Japan could quickly attain its conquest aims and that then America and Britain would agree to a peace treaty at that point rather than fight a bloody war to the finish. But the war proved to be long and Japan was crushed by mid-1945.
Occasional thoughts by the late, lamented 2Blowhards blog's third Blowhard. Head blowhard was Ray Sawhill (aka "Michael Blowhard"), his co-blogger was "Friedrich von Blowhard." I was invited in when Friedrich needed to devote his energy to his business, and had a fun five-year run.
Wednesday, April 17, 2019
Tuesday, April 9, 2019
When You Feel You're Really There
Sorry, but I forget the Web site that inspired this post. What it did was present the idea of being someplace and thinking "Wow, I'm really here!"
I got that feeling many years ago during my Army days when I'd get a weekend pass and go into New York City. Just seeing the skyline would trigger that reaction.
What does the triggering is strongly related to characteristics of the place and, usually, their fame. Moreover, different aspects of the place will trigger different people. And of course the person normally is primed for the reaction to the degree that the place is of passionate interest. For example, for some folks viewing the Eiffel Tower yields the "Wow, I'm really in Paris!" reaction. For me it's being along the Seine in the vicinity of the Ile de la Cité which happens to strike me as being even more Parisian than the tower. Results vary.
Citing the Eiffel Tower suggests that being near a particularly famous structure or place is probably the most common source of the "Wow, I'm here!" reaction. The "I'm really in Rome!" reaction is probably usually set off by viewing the Forum, Colosseum or St. Peter's.
On the other hand, I think that for places such as San Francisco or Seattle it's their overall settings that do the trick. Which does not totally rule out being triggered by being at Fisherman's Wharf or seeing the Space Needle. I suspect the general settings of Paris and Rome are far less likely to evoke strong, positive emotional reactions than the more focused sites noted above.
Regardless, the strong, positive emotional reaction is one of life's pleasures.
I got that feeling many years ago during my Army days when I'd get a weekend pass and go into New York City. Just seeing the skyline would trigger that reaction.
What does the triggering is strongly related to characteristics of the place and, usually, their fame. Moreover, different aspects of the place will trigger different people. And of course the person normally is primed for the reaction to the degree that the place is of passionate interest. For example, for some folks viewing the Eiffel Tower yields the "Wow, I'm really in Paris!" reaction. For me it's being along the Seine in the vicinity of the Ile de la Cité which happens to strike me as being even more Parisian than the tower. Results vary.
Citing the Eiffel Tower suggests that being near a particularly famous structure or place is probably the most common source of the "Wow, I'm here!" reaction. The "I'm really in Rome!" reaction is probably usually set off by viewing the Forum, Colosseum or St. Peter's.
On the other hand, I think that for places such as San Francisco or Seattle it's their overall settings that do the trick. Which does not totally rule out being triggered by being at Fisherman's Wharf or seeing the Space Needle. I suspect the general settings of Paris and Rome are far less likely to evoke strong, positive emotional reactions than the more focused sites noted above.
Regardless, the strong, positive emotional reaction is one of life's pleasures.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)